Scenario Planning over Forecasting
There are moments in history where traditional forecasting
methods have failed (Ademmer & Boysen-Hogrefe, 2022). While it is not possible to
completely what will occur in the future. Organizations can attempt to predict
what may occur based on historical precedent and accumulated data (Klimberg et al., 2010). While some errors do not
have severe impacts, there are times in history where forecasting errors can
have consequences. In this individual project, one of these forecasting errors
will be discussed. Following the summary will be a discussion on how scenario-planning
supports futuring and innovation. The forces that support scenario-planning
will be identified as well. The project will conclude with the student
considering how they will use scenario-planning for future innovation efforts.
Forecast Failure: The Great Recession
One of the more recent forecast errors that resulted in far
reaching consequences was the economic crisis of 2007 – 2009 (Gadea Rivas & Pérez-Quirós, 2012). This event is also known as
the Great Recession. This event occurred due to a long period of rapid expansion
of the US housing market from the 1990s to the mid-2000s (Gadea Rivas & Pérez-Quirós, 2012). With this expansion, there
was a large issuance of high-risk mortgages being approved and repackaged into
securities. This resulted in an increased demand for homes and increased the
prices of homes. Unfortunately, this bubble would burst. Causing a dramatic
decrease in home prices and banks risking closure.
The primary issue of forecasting is that the methods used by
most economist’s did not foresee the crisis occurring. (Gadea Rivas & Pérez-Quirós, 2012). Despite the issuance of
high-risk mortgages at a high-rate, most forecasters did not predict the Great
Recession (Gadea Rivas & Pérez-Quirós, 2012). While scenario-planning may
not have been feasible at such a large scale, individual organizations may have
been able to minimize the impact. Including the banks that issued the high-risk
loans (Gadea Rivas & Pérez-Quirós, 2012).
Scenario-Planning Discussion
Scenario-Planning is a method of futuring that can be used
to make long-term plans based on unknown certainties that an organization may
face (Chermack et al., 2001). An organization identifies
the driving forces of society, economics, technology, and politics that could
impact the company in the future. Once the forces are determined, the uncertainties
from these forces are identified. The organization will then develop scenarios
that could be a result of the uncertainties. The final step will be to
determine the impact and implications that could arise from the different scenarios
(Amer et al., 2013).
Support for Innovation and Change
Scenario-planning provides multiple scenarios that could impact and organization in the future. An example of this would be the continuing effort to reduce carbon emissions and increase the efforts of clean energy (Chakraborty & Mazzanti, 2020). Forces are shifting to reduce the carbon footprint that humanity has been inflicting on the planet. Scenario-planning by organizations looking at these forces could determine scenarios that could heavily impact the business. To reduce the carbon footprint of airline travel, there have been innovations in fuel that airplanes can use. Sustainable aviation fuel in one innovation that produces a fraction of the carbon compared to standard fuel (Ng et al., 2021). Figure 1 demonstrates the climate impact of sustainable aviation fuel (Teoh et al., 2022). Further innovations in sustainable energy could come from scenario-planning.
Figure 1
Targeted Use of Sustainable Aviation Fuel to Maximize
Climate Benefits
Environ. Sci.
Technol. 2022, 56, 23, 17246-17255
Forces Contributing to Scenario-Planning Innovation
The 2020s has seen an increase in societal and political forces
of climate activism (Tillotson et al., 2023). These forces have been
increasing pressure on organizations to make plans to reduce their climate
footprint. While there is still a debate on the degree of necessary alarmism
for these forces (Tillotson et al., 2023). Innovation from
organizations that contribute to climate change is still necessary to continue
business. New forms of sustainable energy from hydrogen, sustainable aviation
fuel, graphene, and fusion could be more prevalent in the future (Naber et al., 2017).
Futuring the Future of Phishing
The question now is how can scenario-planning be used to predict
futures scenarios of phishing? While there are organizations that work in the information
security sector, there are few that specialize in phishing. Scenario-planning
could be used to determine how phishing will be used in the future. One particular
force that is current is the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence, or AI (Zhou et al., 2023). It was not long before the time of this writing
that AI art was barely recognizable and AI voice production was barely
intelligible. In a short time, AI can now rapidly produce works of art, translate
text-to-speech to sound like any celebrity, and even be used for homework (Mageira et al., 2022).
This driving force in technology could see a more effective method
of social engineering that is not expected. AI will be able to draft letters
that are specific to any person based on a few prompts (Caulfield, 2023). Grammatical and spelling errors are becoming
minimal with the help of AI. Scenario-planning could allow the few counter-phishing
organizations to begin planning mitigations now. The student using this same
scenario-planning could also begin research into how AI will impact the future of
phishing.
References
Ademmer, M., & Boysen-Hogrefe, J.
(2022). The impact of forecast errors on fiscal planning and debt accumulation.
Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und
Statistik, 242(2), 171-190.
Amer,
M., Daim, T. U., & Jetter, A. (2013). A review of scenario planning. Futures, 46, 23-40.
Caulfield,
M. (2023). ChatGPT is changing the
phishing game. Retrieved May 31 from https://www.securityinfowatch.com/cybersecurity/information-security/breach-detection/article/53057705/chatgpt-is-changing-the-phishing-game
Chakraborty,
S. K., & Mazzanti, M. (2020). Energy intensity and green energy innovation:
Checking heterogeneous country effects in the OECD. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 52, 328-343.
Chermack,
T. J., Lynham, S. A., & Ruona, W. E. (2001). A review of scenario planning
literature. Futures research quarterly,
17(2), 7-32.
Gadea
Rivas, M. D., & Pérez-Quirós, G. (2012). The Failure to Predict the Great
Recession-The Failure of Academic Economics? A View Focusing on the Role of
Credit.
Klimberg,
R. K., Sillup, G. P., Boyle, K. J., & Tavva, V. (2010). Forecasting
performance measures–what are their practical meaning? In Advances in business and management forecasting (pp. 137-147). Emerald
Group Publishing Limited.
Mageira,
K., Pittou, D., Papasalouros, A., Kotis, K., Zangogianni, P., & Daradoumis,
A. (2022, 2022
2023-05-01).
Educational AI Chatbots for Content and Language Integrated Learning. Applied Sciences, 12(7), 3239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073239
Naber,
R., Raven, R., Kouw, M., & Dassen, T. (2017). Scaling up sustainable energy
innovations. Energy Policy, 110,
342-354.
Ng, K.
S., Farooq, D., & Yang, A. (2021). Global biorenewable development strategies
for sustainable aviation fuel production. Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 150, 111502.
Teoh,
R., Schumann, U., Voigt, C., Schripp, T., Shapiro, M., Engberg, Z., Molloy, J.,
Koudis, G., & Stettler, M. E. (2022). Targeted use of sustainable aviation
fuel to maximize climate benefits. Environmental
Science & Technology, 56(23), 17246-17255.
Tillotson,
P., Slade, R., Staffell, I., & Halttunen, K. (2023). Deactivating climate
activism? The seven strategies oil and gas majors use to counter rising
shareholder action. Energy Research &
Social Science, 103, 103190.
Zhou,
L., Rudin, C., Gombolay, M., Spohrer, J., Zhou, M., & Souren, P. (2023).
From Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Intelligence Augmentation (IA): Design
Principles, Potential Risks, and Emerging Issues. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interactions, 15(1), 111-135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00185
Comments
Post a Comment